Mineral nutrition optimization for apple trees by fertigation to enhance productivity and fruit quality in intensive orchards of southern Kazakhstan

In response to Kazakhstan's priority of enhancing food security and reducing fruit imports, this study investigates the efficacy of different fertilization methods on the yield, fruit quality, and economic performance of intensive apple orchards. Given the increasing area of apple cultivation in Kazakhstan, optimizing fertilization practices is crucial for maximizing production and ensuring sustainability.: The study aims to evaluate the impact of three fertilization methods- existing technology without NPK, NPK incorporation into the soil, and fertigation-on the yield and quality of Geromini apple trees grown on dwarf M9 rootstocks. The research also assesses the economic efficiency of each method. Conducted from 2019 to 2022 in Turkestan, Kazakhstan, the study employed a randomized block design with four replications for each fertilization Treatment. Key parameters measured included fruit yield, quality (sugar content, dry matter, firmness), macroelement uptake (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium), and economic metrics. Fertigation emerged as the most effective method, resulting in the highest average gross yield (30.6 t/ha), marketable yield (28.7 t/ha), and fruit quality metrics, including sugar content (24.1%) and average fruit weight. Fertigation also demonstrated superior macroelement uptake, with the highest levels of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium. Economically, fertigation proved to be the most cost-effective method, providing a favorable return on investment compared to soil incorporation and traditional fertilization methods. The study concludes that fertigation significantly enhances both the yield and quality of apples while optimizing economic returns. This method’s efficiency in nutrient delivery and uptake positions it as the most advantageous practice for intensive apple orchards. Further research is recommended to refine fertigation techniques and explore sustainable practices for long-term orchard productivity.

1. Bolatova ZH. B. Proizvodstvo yablok v Kazakhstane: ustoychivoye razvitiye otras- li //Ekonomika i ekologiya territorial'nykh obrazovaniy. – 2022. – T. 6. – № 3. – S. 33-40.

2. [Electronic resource]: Crop production statistics. Access mode: http://fao- stat.fao.org, Accessed: May 2022, free.

3. Asylbek A. M. i dr. Rasprostraneniye gribov rodov Nectria i Neonectria na yugo- vostoke Kazakhstana// Problemy botaniki Yuzhnoy Sibiri i Mongolii. – 2023. – T. 22. – № 1. – S. 21-25.

4. Nurmuratuly T. i dr. Genofond mestnykh i starodavnikh sortov yabloni, grushi, abrikosa i vinograda na yuge i yugo-vostoke Kazakhstana. – 2012. 5. Sagitov A. O. i dr. Rezul'taty ispytaniy integrirovannogo kompleksa zashchity yabloni ot dominantnykh vidov vrediteley na yugo-vostoke Kazakhstana// Plodovodstvo i yagodovodstvo Rossii. – 2013. – T. 36. – № 2. – S. 155-160.

5. Zhandybayev O., Malimbayeva A., Zhumabayeva R. Review of modern methods for optimizing apple mineral nutrition to increase yield and fruit preservaation// Pochvovedeniye i agrokhimiya. – 2024. – № 2. – С. 78-93.

6. Goossens Y. et al. Life cycle assessment (LCA) for apple orchard production systems including low and high productive years in conventional, integrated and organic farms// Agricultural Systems. – 2017. – Т. 153. – С. 81-93.

7. Agroklimaticheskiy spravochnik po Yuzhno-Kazakhstanskoy oblasti [Tekst] / Otv.red.R.D.Kurdin, 1961. - 149 s.

8. Pomologiya: V 5-ti tomakh. T. I. Yablonya / pod obshchey redaktsiyey akademika RAN P-55 Ye.N. Sedova. – M.: RAN. – 2020. – 634 s.

9. Udobreniye i diagnostika mineral'nogo pitaniya plodovo-yagodnykh kul'tur: uchebnoye posobiye / L.A. Mikhaylova, M.G. Subbotina, M.A. Aloshin. – Perm' : IPTS «Prokrost"», 2019.– 247 s.; 11. Ahad S. et al. Nutrient management in high density apple orchards–A Review// Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. – 2018. – Т. 29. – №. 1. – С. 1-16.

10. Mikhaylova L. A., Subbotina M. G., Aloshin M. A. Udobreniye i diagnostika mine- ral'nogo pitaniya plodovo-yagodnykh kul'tur. – 2019.

11. Ferna ndez F. G., Hoeft R. G. Managing soil pH and crop nutrients// Illinois agronomy handbook. – 2009. – Т. 24. – С. 91-112.

12. Hartemink A. E., Barrow N. J. Soil pH-nutrient relationships: the diagram// Plant and Soil. – 2023. – Т. 486. – № 1. – С. 209-215.

13. Gondal A. H. et al. Influence of soil pH and microbes on mineral solubility and plant nutrition: A review// International Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences. – 2021. – Т. 5. – № 1. – С. 71-81.

14. Dospekhov B. A. Metodika polevogo opyta. – 2011.

15. Kondakov A. K., Pastukhova A. A. Metodicheskiye ukazaniya po zakladke i prove- deniyu opytov s udobreniyami v plodovykh i yagodnykh nasazhdeniyakh// M.: TSINAO. – 1981.

16. Spivakovskiy N. D., Gel'fandbeyn P. S., Novikov A. A. Treatmentmno-metodiches- kiye ukazaniya po agrotekhnicheskim opytam s plodovymi i yagodnymi kul'turami// Michurinsk: VNIIS. – 1956.

17. Ginzburg K. Ye., Shcheglova G. M. Opredeleniye azota, fosfora i kaliya v rastitel'nom materiale iz odnoy naveski// Pochvovedeniye. – 1960. – T. 5. – S. 100-105.

18. Baglay G. I. i dr. Sposob vydeleniya fosfatidov iz masla. – 1954.

19. Embree C., Wright H., Nichols D. Evaluating the accountability of trunk size and canopy volume models for determining apple tree production potential across diverse management regimes// VII International Symposium on Modelling in Fruit Research and Orchard Management 707. – 2004. – С. 237-243.

20. Davis P. F. Factors influencing the keeping qualities of apples in cold storage. – 1917.

21. Temma T., Hanamatsu K., Shinoki F. Measuring the sugar content of apples and apple juice by near infrared spectroscopy// Optical review. – 2002. – Т. 9. – № 2. – С. 40-44.

22. Zhandybayev O., Malimbayeva A., Yelibayeva G. Otsenka vliyaniya razlichnykh strategii upravleniya elementami pitaniya yabloni (malus pumila) v intensivnykh sadakh Kazakhstana. rezul'taty 4-letnego issledovaniya// Pochvovedeniye i agrokhimiya. – 2023. – № 2. – S. 67-77.

23. Alikhanov D. i dr. Algoritm i treatmentma opredeleniya parametrov yabloko tsifrovym metodom// Izdenister natigeler. – 2024. – № 1 (101). – S. 288-299.

24. Di Vaio C. et al. Effect of interstock (M. 9 and M. 27) on vegetative growth and yield of apple trees (cv “Annurca”)// Scientia Horticulturae. – 2009. – Т. 119. – № 3. – С. 270-274.

25. Orken Z. et al. Effect of fertigation on nutrient dynamics of gray-brown soils and apple (Malus pumila) yields in intensive orchards of Kazakhstan// Research on Crops. – 2023. – Т. 24. – № 3. – С. 506-514.

26. Batjer L. P. et al. Effects of various amounts of nitrogen, potassium and phos- phorus on growth and assimilation in young apple trees// J. agric. Res. – 1940. – Т. 60. – С. 101-16.

27. Mohammad Sokri S. et al. Fruit quality and nitrogen, potassium, and calcium content of apple as influenced by nitrate: ammonium ratios in tree nutrition// Journal of Plant Nutrition. – 2015. – Т. 38. – № 10. – С. 1619-1627.

28. Merwin I. A., Stiles W. C. Orchard groundcover management impacts on apple tree growth and yield, and nutrient availability and uptake// Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. – 1994. – Т. 119. – № 2. – С. 209-215.

29. Zdravkova A., Krishkova I. Economic efficiency of apple fertilization. – 2017.