Biopreparations as a factor of increasing the yield and quality of agricultural products

Optimal use of fertilizers is possible only with their rational combination with a complex of biological preparations and technologies. The purpose of this article is to review the literature on the study of the effect of biological products on soil fertility and crop yields, as well as their protective effects against the main diseases of crops. The advantages of the use of biological products in agriculture are shown, it is found that the scientifically justified use of physiologically active substances in the cultivation of field crops significantly reduces the effects of the use of chemical plant protection products. With the complex application of biologization techniques in agriculture, it is possible to obtain a high environmentally friendly crop yield by increasing soil fertility, improving its health, combating pathogenic microflora in it and plant diseases. That is, environmentally oriented systems in agriculture based on biological products make it possible to reduce doses of mineral fertilizers, increase productivity and product quality against the background of cost reduction and increase profitability of production.

1. Ilchenko A. V. Ekologıcheskıe problemy zemledelııa// Problemy sovremennoı ekonomıkı. - 2015. - №23. - S.97-102.

2. Bashkın V. N. Sovremennye problemy bıologızatsıı zemledelııa// Jızn Zemlı. - 2022. - №2. - S.180-191.

3. Sokolov N. A., Dıachenko O. V., Babıak M. A. Tendentsıı bıologızatsıı zemledelııa brıanskoı oblastı// Vestnık Kyrskoı gosydarstvennoı selskohozıaıstvennoı akademıı. - 2021. - №2. - S.65-73.

4. Osnova bıologızatsıı zemledelııa selskohozıaıstvennyh agrolandshaftov/ N.V. Dolgopolova, E.V. Malysheva, A.V. Nagornyh, A.A. Voronına, B.M. Kovynev// Vestnık Kyrskoı gosydarstvennoı selskohozıaıstvennoı akademıı. - 2021. - №7. - S. 6-11.

5. Lovchıkov A.P., Lovchıkov V.P., Pozdeev E.A. Bıologızatsııa zemledelııa v resyrsosberegaıyıh tehnologııah vozdelyvanııa zernovyh kyltyr// MNIJ. - 2016. - №1-2 (43). - S. 44-47.

6. Charkov S.M. Bıologızatsııa zemledelııa respyblıkı Hakasııa - strategıcheskıı pyt razvıtııa// Vestnık HGY ım. N.F. Katanova. - 2015. - №11. - S. 17-19.

7. Vıhoreva G.V., Shıshkına S.V. Vlııanıe prıemov bıologızatsıı na povyshenıe plodorodııa pochv Verhnevoljıa// Vladımırskıı Zemledelets. - 2022. - №2. - S.10-13.

8. Otsenka effektıvnostı faktorov bıologızatsıı v zemledelıı Yralskogo regıona/ N.N. Zezın, M.A. Namıatov, P.A. Postnıkov, Iy.N. Zybarev// Permskıı agrarnyı vestnık. - 2019. - №1 (25). - S.34-41.

9. Lykmanov A.A., Gaırov R.R., Karımova L. Z. Bıologızatsııa zemledelııa - deshevyı ıstochnık povyshenııa plodorodııa pochv//Agrohımıcheskıı vestnık. - 2015. - №2. - S.6-9.

10. Lykın S. V. Vlııanıe bıologızatsıı zemledelııa na plodorodıe pochv ı prodyktıvnost agrotsenozov (na prımere Belgorodskoı oblastı)// Zemledelıe. - 2021. - №1. - S. 11-15.

11. Mydryh N. M. Bıologızatsııa zemledelııa - osnova sohranenııa plodorodııa pochv Nechernozemnoı zony// Vestnık AGAY. - 2017. - №9 (155). - S.28-34.

12. Ypravlenıe plodorodıem pochv na osnove ıntensıfıkatsıı bıologıcheskıh faktorov v sıstemah zemledelııa/ V.N. Masalov, N.A.Berezına, V.T. Lobkov, Iy.A. Bobkova// Vestnık OrelGAY. - 2021. - №3 (90). - S. 10-17.

13. Intensıfıkatsııa bıologıcheskıh faktorov vosproızvodstva plodorodııa pochvy v zemledelıı: monografııa/ V.T. Lobkov, N.I. Abakymov, Iy.A. Bobkova, V.V. Napolov. Orеl: Izd-vo FGBOY VO Orlovskıı GAY, 2016. - 160 s.

14. Dydkın I.V., Dydkına T.A. Bıoenergetıcheskaıa otsenka faktorov bıologızatsıı zemledelııa// Vestnık Kyrskoı gosydarstvennoı selskohozıaıstvennoı akademıı. - 2017. - №2. - S.6-10.

15. Koınova A.N. Bıologızatsııa zemledelııa: realıı ı perspektıvy// AgroForym. 2019. - №7. - S.41-47.

16. Aleınık S.A. Zemlıa ne terpıt ravnodyshııa// Belgorodskıı agromır. - 2017. - №3 (105). - S.6-13.

17. Fokın A.D. Pochva, bıosfera ı jızn na Zemle. - M. : Nayka, 1986. - 177 s.

18. Kyznetsov V.I., Shaylskıı Iy.M., Gılıazetdınov Sh.Ia. Antıstressovoe vysokoyrojaınoe zemledelıe (AVZ) – bıotehnologııa vyraıvanııa selskhozıaı-stvennyh kyltyr, kak ınnovatsıonnaıa osnova sovremennogo zemledelııa.// Dosıjenııa naykı ı tehnıkı APK. - № 5. - 2011. - S. 17-19.

19. Kolomıets E.I. Mıkrobnye pestıtsıdy: teoretıcheskıe ı prıkladnye aspekty/ Mat. naych. nayk. konf./ Kolomıets E.I., Romanovskaıa T.V., Zdor N.A. – Kshv. – 2004. - S. 428-432.

20. Kolomıets E.I. Novye podhody k sozdanııy sredstv bıologıcheskogo kontrolıa/ Zaıta rastenıı. Mat. naychnoı konf. –Mınsk. 2006. - v. 30. - ch. I. - S. 474-480.

21. Pereverzeva V.F. Bıologıcheskaıa zaıta ovonyh kyltyr ot naıbolee vredonosnyh bolezneı// Ovochivnıtstvo i bash-tannıtstvo. 2001. - v. 45. - S. 297-301.

22. Emmert E.A.B., Handelsman J. Biocontrol of plant disease: a (Gram-) positive perspective// FEMS Microbiology Letters. – 1999. - №171. – P. 1-9.

23. Bais H.P., FallR., Vivanco J.M. Biocontrol efficiency of Bacillus subtilis (6051) against Pseudomonas syringe (DC 3000) in Arabidopsis Thaliana roots is facilitated by biofilm formation and surfactin production// Plant Physiology. – 2004. - №134. - P. 307-319.

24. Novogrydskaıa E.D. Azotobakterıı kak sredstvo snıjenııa porajennostı rastenıı boleznıamı. V kn. «Preparaty mıkrobıologıcheskogo sınteza». - M., 1981. - S. 109-114.

25. Prıdachına N.N. Azotobacter chroococcum - prodytsent antıgrıbkovyh antıbıotıkov. V kn. «Antıbıotıkı». – 1982. - № 1. - S. 3-5.

26. Logınov O.N., Pygacheva E.G., Sılıev N.N., Galımzıanova N.F., Boıko T.F. Otsenka vlııanııa shtammov bakterıı-antagonıstov roda Azotoba^er na porajenıe kornevymı gnılıamı ı yrojaınost posevov ıarovoı mıagkoı pshenıtsy// S.-h. bıol., Ser. Bıol. rast. – 2004. - №5. - S. 104-108.

27. Zavalın, A.A. Bıopreparaty, ydobrenııa ı yrojaı [Tekst]/ A.A. Zavalın. – M.: Izd-vo VNIIA, 2005. – 302 s.

28. Calvo, P.; Nelson, L.; Kloepper, J.W. Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants. Plant Soil. – 2014. - №383. – P. 3–41.

29. Colla, G.; Rouphael, Y. Biostimulants in horticulture. Sci. Hortic. – 2015. - №196. – P. 1–2.

30. Du Jardin, P. Plant biostimulants: Definition, concept, main categories and regulation. Sci. Hortic. – 2015. - №196. – P. 3–14.

31. Schaafsma, G. Safety of protein hydrolysates, fractions thereof and bioactive peptides in human nutrition. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. – 2009. - №63. – P. 1161–1168.

32. Colla, G.; Rouphael, Y.; Canaguier, R.; Svecova, E.; Cardarelli, M. Biostimulant action of a plant-derived protein hydrolysate produced through enzymatic hydrolysis. Front. Plant Sci. – 2014. - №5. – P. 448.

33. Ertani, A.; Cavani, L.; Pizzeghello, D.; Brandellero, E.; Altissimo, A.; Ciavatta, C.; Nardi, S. Biostimulant activity of two protein hydrolyzates in the growth and nitrogen metabolism of maize seedlings. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. – 2009. - №172. – P. 237–244.

34. Matsumiya, Y.; Kubo, M. Soybean Peptide: Novel Plant Growth Promoting Peptide from Soybean; InTech Europe: Rijeka, Croatia, - 2011. - P. 215–230.

35. Kauffman, G.L.; Kneivel, D.P.; Watschke, T.L. Effects of a biostimulant on the heat tolerance associated with photosynthetic capacity, membrane thermostability, and polyphenol production of perennial ryegrass. Crop. Sci. – 2007. - №47. – P. 261–267.

36. Lucini, L.; Rouphael, Y.; Cardarelli, M.; Canaguier, R.; Kumar, P.; Colla, G. The effect of a plant-derived biostimulant on metabolic profiling and crop performance of lettuce grown under saline conditions. Sci. Hortic. – 2015. - №182. – P. 124–133.

37. Colla, G.; Cardarelli, M.; Bonini, P.; Rouphael, Y. Foliar applications of protein hydrolysate, plant and seaweed extracts increase yield but differentially modulate fruit quality of greenhouse tomato. Hortscience. – 2017. - №52. – P. 1214–1220.

38. Colla, G.; Hoagland, L.; Ruzzi, M.; Cardarelli, M.; Bonini, P.; Canaguier, R.; Rouphael, Y. Biostimulant action of protein hydrolysates: Unraveling their effects on plant physiology and microbiome. Front. Plant Sci. – 2017. - №8.

39. Rouphael, Y.; Colla, G.; Giordano, M.; El-Nalchel, C.; Kyriacou, M.C.; De Pascale, S. Foliar applications of a legume-derived protein hydrolysate elicit dose-dependent increases of growth, leaf mineral composition, yield and fruit quality in two greenhouse tomato cultivars. Sci. Hortic. – 2017. - №226. – P. 353–360.

40. Ertani, A.; Pizzeghello, D.; Francioso, O.; Sambo, P.; Sanchez-Cortes, S.; Nardi, S. Capsicum chinensis L. growth and nutraceutical properties are enhanced by biostimulants in a long-term period: Chemical and metabolomic approaches. Front. Plant Sci. – 2014. – P.5.

41. Ito, Y.; Nakanomyo, I.; Motose, H.; Iwamoto, K.; Sawa, S.; Dohmae, N.; Fukuda, H. Dodeca-CLE peptides as suppressors of plant stem cell differentiation. Science. – 2006. - №313. – P. 842–845.

42. Kondo, T.; Sawa, S.; Kinoshita, A.; Mizuno, S.; Kakimoto, T.; Fukuda, H.; Sakagami, Y. A plant peptide encoded by CLV3 identified by in situ MALDI-TOF MS analysis. Science. – 2006. - №313. – P. 845–848.

43. Ryan, C.A.; Pearce, G. Polypeptide hormones. Plant Physiol. – 2001. - №125. – P. 65–68.

44. Ryan, C.A.; Pearce, G.; Scheer, J.; Moura, D.S. Polypeptide hormones. Plant Cell. – 2002. -№14. - P. 251–264.

45. Schiavon, M.; Ertani, A.; Nardi, S. Effects of an alfalfa protein hydrolysate on the gene expression and activity of enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and nitrogen metabolism in Zea mays L. J. Agric. Food Chem.- 2008. - №56. – P. 11800–11808.

46. Baglieri, A.; Cadili, V.; Monterumici, C.M.; Gennari, M.; Tabasso, S.; Montoneri, E.; Nardi, S.; Negre, M. Fertilization of bean plants with tomato plants hydrolysates. Effect on biomass production, chlorophyll content and N assimilation. Sci. Hortic. – 2014. - №176. – P. 194–199.

47. Paradikovic, N.; Vinkovic, T.; Vrcek, I.V.; Zuntar, I.; Bojic, M.; Medic-Saric, M. Effect of natural biostimulants on yield and nutritional quality: An example of sweet yellow pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) plants. J. Sci. Food Agric. – 2011. - №91. –P.2146–2152.

48. Parrado, J.; Escudero-Gilete, M.L.; Friaza, V.; Garcia-Martinez, A.; Gonzalez-Miret, M.L.; Bautista, J.D.; Heredia, F.J. Enzymatic vegetable extract with bio-active components: Influence of fertiliser on the colour and anthocyanins of red grapes. J. Sci. Food Agric. – 2007. - №87. – P. 2310–2318.

49. Zodape, S.T.; Gupta, A.; Bhandari, S.C.; Rawat, U.S.; Chaudhary, D.R.; Eswaran, K.; Chikara, J. Foliar application of seaweed sap as biostimulant for enhancement of yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). J. Sci. Ind. Res. – 2011. - №70. – P. 215–219.

50. de Vasconcelos, A.C.F.; Zhang, X.Z.; Ervin, E.H.; Kiehl, J.D. Enzymatic antioxidant responses to biostimulants in maize and soybean subjected to drought. Sci. Agric. – 2009. - №66. – P. 395–402.

51. Botta, A. Enhancing plant tolerance to temperature stress with amino acids: An approach to their mode of action. In I World Congress on the Use of Biostimulants in Agriculture; Silva, S.S., Brown, P., Ponchet, M., Eds.; International Society for Horticultural Science: Leuven, Belgium. -2013. – Vol. 1009. - P. 29–35.

52. Colla, G.; Svecova, E.; Cardarelli, M.; Rouphael, Y.; Reynaud, H.; Canaguier, R.; Planques, B. Effectiveness of a plant-derived protein hydrolysate to improve crop performances under different growing conditions. In I World Congress on the Use of Biostimulants in Agriculture; Silva, S.S., Brown, P., Ponchet, M., Eds.; International Society for Horticultural Science: Leuven, Belgium. – 2013. – Vol. 1009. - P. 175–179.

53. Rouphael, Y.; Cardarelli, M.; Bonini, P.; Colla, G. Synergistic action of a microbial-based biostimulant and a plant derived-protein hydrolysate enhances lettuce tolerance to alkalinity and salinity. Front. Plant Sci. – 2017. - №8. – P. 131.

54. Epstein, E.; Ludwigmuller, J. Indole-3-butyric acid in plants—Occurrence, synthesis, metabolism and transport. Physiol. Plant. – 1993. - №88. – P. 382–389.

55. Ludwig-Muller, J. Indole-3-butyric acid in plant growth and development. Plant Growth Regul. – 2000. - №32. – P. 219–230.

56. Nordstrom, A.C.; Jacobs, F.A.; Eliasson, L. Effect of exogenous indole-3-acetic-acid and indole-3-butyric acid on internal levels of the respective auxins and their conjugation with aspartic-acid during adventitious root-formation in pea cuttings. Plant Physiol. – 1991. - №96. –P.856–861.

57. Husen, A.; Pal, M. Metabolic changes during adventitious root primordium development in Tectona grandis Linn. f. (teak) cuttings as affected by age of donor plants and auxin (IBA and NAA) treatment. New Forests. – 2007. - №33. – P. 309–323.

58. De Klerk, G.J.; Van der Krieken, W.; De Jong, J.C. Review—The formation of adventitious roots: New concepts, new possibilities. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant. – 1999. - №35. – P. 189–199.

59. da Costa, C.T.; de Almeida, M.R.; Ruedell, C.M.; Schwambach, J.; Maraschin, F.S.; Fett-Neto, A.G. When stress and development go hand in hand: Main hormonal controls of adventitious rooting in cuttings. Front. Plant Sci. – 2013. - №4.

60. Fabijan, D.; Taylor, J.S.; Reid, D.M. Adventitious rooting in hypocotyls of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seedlings.2. Action of gibberellins, cytokinins, auxins and ethylene. Physiol. Plant. – 1981. - №53. – P. 589–597.

61. Hartmann, H.T.; Kester, D.E.; Davies, F., Jr.; Geneve, R.L. Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices, 8th ed.; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. - 2011.

62. Liu, J.H.; Reid, D.M. Adventitious rooting in hypocotyls of sunflower (Helianthus annuus) seedlings.4. The role of changes in endogenous free and conjugated indole-3-acetic-acid. Physiol. Plant. – 1992. - №86. – P. 285–292.

63. Lucini, L.; Rouphael, Y.; Cardarelli, M.; Bonini, P.; Baffi, C.; Colla, G. A vegetal biopolymer-based biostimulant promoted root growth in melon while triggering brassinosteroids and stress-related compounds. Front. Plant Sci. – 2018. -№9.

64. Trevisan, S.; Manoli, A.; Ravazzolo, L.; Franceschi, C.; Quaggiotti, S. mRNA-sequencing analysis reveals transcriptional changes in root of maize seedlings treated with two increasing concentrations of a new biostimulant. J. Agric. Food Chem. – 2017. - №65. – P. 9956–9969.

65. Colla, G.; Nardi, S.; Cardarelli, M.; Ertani, A.; Lucini, L.; Canaguier, R.; Rouphael, Y. Protein hydrolysates as biostimulants in horticulture. Sci. Hortic. – 2015. - №196. – P. 28–38.

66. Sadanov A. Vysokıı potentsıal bıoındystrıı/ A. Sadanov// Kazahstanskaıa pravda. - 2014. - 12 dek. - S. 24.

67. Moıseeva A.P. Obosnovanıe prımenenııa bıologıcheskıh sredstv v zaıte polevyh kyltyr ot bolezneı. - 1999. – 126 s.

68. William Beecroft Bottomley. The Assimilation of Nitrogen by certain Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria in the Soil. – 1910.

69. Mıkrobıologıch: ychebnık dlıa vyzov/ V. T. Emtsev, E. N. Mıshystın. – 6-e ızd., ıspr. – M.: Drofa, 2006. – 444 [4] s.

70. Zhakeeva M.B., Bekenova U.S., Zhumadilova Zh.Sh., Shorabaev E.Zh., Abdieva K.M., Sadanov A.K. Effect of different doses biologics on productivity and biometrics alfalfa. - 2015.

71. Shtokolov I.T. Tehnologııa ı sredstva mehanızatsıı podgotovkı pestıtsıdov ı mıneralnyh ydobrenıı dlıa sovmestnogo prımenenııa–Voronej: Tsentr. Chernozem, 1981. – 31 s.

72. Lelıak, A.A. Antagonıstıcheskıı potentsıal sıbırskıh shtammov Bacillus spp. v otnoshenıı vozbydıteleı bolezneı jıvotnyh ı rastenıı/ A. A. Lelıak, M. V. Shternshıs// J. of Biology. – 2014. – No 1. – S. 42–55.

73. Shternshıs, M.V. Bıopreparaty na osnove bakterıı roda Bacillus dlıa ypravlenııa zdorovem rastenıı/ M. V. Shternshıs [ı dr.]. – Novosıbırsk Izdat. Sıbırsk. Ros. AN, 2016. – 284 s .

74. Botbaeva, J.T. Otbor shtammov roda Bacillus s protıvogrıbkovoı aktıvnostıy dlıa sozdanııa effektıvnyh bıopreparatov/ J. T. Botbaeva [ı dr.]// Bıol. med. geogr. – 2011. – No 2. – S. 29–33.

75. Prıhodko, S.I. Antagonıstıcheskıe svoıstva bakterıı, vydelennyh ız lıstev kapysty/ S. I. Prıhodko, O. V. Selıtskaıa// AgroEkoInfo. – 2015. – No 6. – S. 101.

76. Grabova, A.Iy. Skrınıng shtammov bakterıı roda Bacillus – aktıvnyh antagonıstov fıtopatogenov bakterıalnoı ı grıbnoı prırody/ A. Iy. Grabova [ı dr.]// Mıkrobıol. jyrn. – 2015. – No 6. – S. 47–54.

77. Zlotnıkov A.K. Sravnıtelnaıa vosproızvodımost v polevyh opytah effektov bıopreparata ı etalonov/ A. K. Zlotnıkov/ Agro-XXI. – 2013. – № 10-12.

78. Zlotnıkov A.K. Sravnıtelnaıa effektıvnost stımylıatorov rosta ı bıofyngıtsıdov v polevyh yslovııah/ A.K. Zlotnıkov/ Agro-XXI. – 2013. – № 7-9. – S. 22-24.