INFLUENCE OF HIGH SUBSTRATE CONCENTRATIONS ON CATALASE REACTION IN LOAM SOIL (YGDIR PROVINCE, TURKEY). I. THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE KINETICS OF ENZYMATIC SOIL REACTIONS
https://doi.org/10.51886/1999-740X_2022_3_60
Abstract
The paper presents classical and modern concepts of modeling enzymatic processes and determining the initial rate of an enzymatic reaction by graphical and analytical methods. Methods for determining the initial rate of the enzymatic reaction in soils are given. In contrast to the Newton-Gregory analytical method, a new method is proposed for determining the initial rates of reactions catalyzed by enzymes. For this purpose, the most commonly used in modeling are recommended: hyperbolic, binomial, binomial-parabolic polynomials of the 5th and 6th degree, pseudopolynomials of the 5th and 6th degree of the model. It is proposed to use a batch program on a computer to calculate the kinetic parameters. The prospects of using mathematical modeling in the study of enzymatic reactions in soil are shown.
About the Author
F. D. Mikailsoy
Faculty of Agriculture of the University "Igdir", Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
Turkey
Turkey
76000, Sehit Bulent Yurtseven Campus, Igdir
References
1. Michaelis, L. and Menten, M.L. Die Kinetik der Invertinwirkung// Biochem. 1913. – № 49. – RR. 333-369.
2. Briggs G.E., and Haldane J.B.S. A note on the kinetics of enzyme action// Biochem J. – 1925. – RR. 338–339.
3. Yakovlev V.A. Kinetika fermentativnogo kataliza. – Moskva: Nauka, 1965. – 248 s.
4. Tabatabai M. A., Bremner J. M. Michaelis constants of soil enzymes// Soil Biol. Biochem. – 1971. – V 3. - № 4. – PP. 317–323.
5. Khaziyev F.Kh., Agafarova Ya.M., Konstanty Mikhaelisa pochvennykh fermentov// Pochvovedeniye. – 1976. – № 8. – S. 150–157.
6. Aseyeva I.V., Panikov N. S. Kinetika fermentativnykh protsesov raspada nukleinovykh kislot v pochve/ V kn.: Ekologicheskiye usloviya i fermentativnaya aktivnost pochv. – Ufa, 1979. – S. 112–125.
7. Kornish-Bouden E. Osnovy fermentativnoy kinetiki. – M.: Mir, 1979. – 280 s.
8. Aliyev S. A., Gadzhiyev D. A., Mikayylov F. D. Kineticheskiye pokazateli aktivnosti katalazy v osnovnykh tipakh pochv Azerbaydzhanskoy SSR// Pochvovedeniye. – 1981. № 9. – S. 107–112.
9. Aliyev S. A., Gadzhiyev D. A., Mikayylov F. D. Kineticheskiye i termodinamicheskiye kharakteristiki fermentov invertazy i ureazy v pochvakh Azerbaydzhanskoy SSR// Pochvovedeniye.– 1984. – № 11. – S. 55–66.
10. Keleti T. Osnovy fermentativnoy kinetiki. – Moskva: Mir, 1990. – 352 s.
11. Kursky M.D., Kosterin S.A., Rybalchenko V.K. Biokhimicheskaya kinetika. – Kiyev: Vishcha shkola, 1977. – 261 s.
12. Kussainova, M., Er, F., Mikailsoy, F. Assessment of the basic kinetic of catalase in the soil (Province of Konya, Turkey)// The 10th Int Soil Science Congress on “Environment and Soil Resources Conservation”. – Almaty, 2018. – PP. 110–117.
13. Mikayylov F. Otsenka osnovnykh kineticheskikh parametrov katalazy v pochve// Zhivye i biokosnye sistemy. – 2018. 25(3). – C. 1–7.
14. Khaziyev F.Kh. O kinetike fermentativnykh protsessov v pochvakh// Izvestiya Ufimskogo Nauchnogo Tsentra RAN. – 2018. – № 3. – S. 45–51.
15. Yun K.I., Han T.S. Relationship between enzyme concentration and Michaelis constant in enzyme assays// Biochimie. – 2020. – P. 12–20.
16. Yano D., Suzuki T. Kinetic analyses of the substrate inhibition of paramecium arginine kinase// Protein J. – 2018. – 37. P. 581–588.
17. Cornish-Bowden, A. The origins of enzyme kinetics// FEBS Letters. – 2013. – P. 2725–2730.
18. Mikayylov F.D., Khabirov I.K. Nekotorye voprosy modelirovaniya fermentativnykh protsessov v pochve// Pochva kak svyazuyushcheye zveno funktsionirovaniya prirodnykh i antropogenno-preobrazovannykh ekosistem: mater. III Mezhdunar.nauch. prak. konf. – Irkutsk, 2011. – S. 166–171.
19. Kızılkaya R, Samofalova I, Mudrykh N, Mikailsoy F, Akça I, Sushkova S, Minkina T. Assessing the impact of azadirachtin application to soil on urease activity and its kinetic parameters//Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. – 2015. P. 976 – 983.
20. Khaziyev F.Kh. Fermentativnaya aktivnost pochv. – M.: Nauka, 1976. – 180 s.
21. Khaziyev F.Kh. Osobennosti dinamiki fermentativnoy aktivnosti chernozemov v Preduralye// Pochvovedeniye. – 1977. – № 10. – S. 114–125.
22. Khaziyev F.Kh. Sistemno-ekologichesky analiz fermentativnoy aktivnosti pochv. – M.: Nauka, 1982. – 204 s.
23. Khaziyev F.Kh. Metody pochvennoy enzimologii. – M.: Nauka, 2005. – 254 s.
24. Krasilnikov N.A. Mikroorganizmy pochvy i vysshiye rasteniya. – M.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1958. – 464 s.
25. Kozlov K.A. Biologicheskaya aktivnost pochvy// Izvestiya AN SSSR. Ser. biol. nauk. – 1966. – № 5. – S. 719-733.
26. Katsnelson R.S., Yershov V.V. Issledovaniye mikroflory tselinnykh i okulturennykh pochv Karelskoy ASSR// Biologicheskaya aktivnost pochv KASSR/ (Mikrobiologiya. – 1958. – T. 27. – Vyp. 1. – S. 82-88.
27. Galstyan A.Sh. Fermentativnaya aktivnost pochv Armenii. – Yerevan: Ayastan, 1974. – Vyp. 8. – 275 s.
28. Peyve Ya.V. Biokhimiya pochv. – M.: Selkhozgiz, 1961, – 422 s.
29. Galstyan A.Sh. Ob inaktivatsii fermentov pochv//Dokl. AN ArmSSR. – 1965a. T.40, –№ 1. – S. 39–42.
30. Zvyagintsev D.G. Immobilizovannye fermenty v pochvakh// V kn.: Mikrobnye metabolity. – M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1979. – S. 31 –46.
31. Drobnik Ya. Rasshchepleniye krakhmala enzimatncheskim kompleksom pochv// Folia biologica. – 1955. – T. 1. – № 6. – S. 24–40.
32. Hoffmann Ye., und Seegerer A. Uber das Enzymsystem unserer Kulturboden. I: Saccharase// Biochem. Ztschr. –1951. – Bd. 322. – Nr. 1. – S. 174–179.
33. Kiss St. Ujabb adatok a talajszaharaz es a talaj-α-glukozidaz (β-maltaz) azonossagiaval szemben// Stud. Univ. Babcs-Bolyai. Scr. bot. - 1958. - Vol. 3. - № 7. P. 51–55.
34. Kuprevich V.F. Vnekletochnye fermenty korney vysshikh avtotrofnykh rasteny // DAN SSSR. – 1949. – T. 68. – № 5. – S. 953-956.
35. Kuprevich V.F. Biologicheskaya aktivnost pochvy i metody eye opredeleniya// Doklady AN SSSR. – 1951. – T. 79. – № 5. – S. 863–866.
36. Galstyan A.Sh. Izucheniye sravnitelnoy aktivnosti katalazy v nekotorykh tipakh pochv Armenii// Doklady AN ArmSSR. – 1956. – T.23. - №2. – S. 62–65.
37. Runov, E.V., and Terekhov, O.S. The question of the catalasc activity of several forest soils// Soviet Soil Sci. – 1960. – № 9. – P. 974–978.
38. Dikson M., Uebb E. Fermenty. - M.: Mir, 1982. – T. 1-3. – 1120 s.
39. Johnson, J. L. and Temple. K.L. Some variables affecting measurement of ‘catalase activity’ in soil// Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. – 1964. – № 28. – P. 207–209.
40. Kuprevich V. F., Shcherbakova T.A. Pochvennaya enzimologiya. – Minsk: Nauka i tekhnika, 1966. – 275 s.
41. Beck T.H. The determination of catalase activity in soils// J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. – 1971. –№ 130. – P. 68–81.
42. Burns R.G. Enzyme activity in soils: some theoretical and practical considerations// In: Soil Enzymes (Eds: R.G. Burns). – London, Academic Press, 1978. – P. 295–326.
43. Alef K. and Nannipieri P. Catalase activity// Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. – London: Academic Press. – 1995. – R. 362–363.
44. Galstyan A.Sh. Unifikatsiya metodov opredeleniya aktivnosti fermentov pochv// Pochvovedeniye. – 1978. –№ 2. – C. 107–114.
45. Inisheva L.I., Ivleva S.N., Shcherbakova T.A. Rukovodstvo po opredeleniyu fermentativnoy aktivnosti torfyanykh pochv i torfov. – Tomsk: Izd-vo Tom. un-ta, 2002. 119 s.
46. Galstyan A.Sh. Rol fermentov v protsessakh obrazovaniya sody v pochve// Pochvovedeniye. – 1967. – № 5. – S. 89–96.
47. Singkh I., Sakha S.K., De S.K. Aaktivnost katalazy α-gumusa allyuvialnoy pochvy v prisutstvii soley Ca, N, R, K.//Pochvovedeniye. – 1982. – № 11. – C. 101–103.
48. Henri V. Theorie generale de l‘action de quelques diastases// CR Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. – 1902. – P. 916–919.
49. Brown A.J. Enzyme action// J. Chem. Soc. –1902. –81. – PP. 373–388.
50. Henri V. Lois generales de l’action des diastases, Librairie Scientifique A. Hermann. – Paris, 1903. – 129 p.
51. Zhiryakova M.V., Tiflova L.A., Belova V.M., Skokan Ye.V. Issledovaniye kinetiki fermentativnoy reaktsii. – M.: Izd-vo, Khim fak. MGU, 2020. – 30 s.
52. Ogurtsov A. N. Fiziko-khimicheskiye osnovy biotekhnologii. Biokinetika . Kharkov: NTU «KhPI», 2017. – 368 s.
53. Bayramov V.M. Osnovy khimicheskoy kinetiki i kataliza. – M.: Izdatelsky tsentr «Akademiya», 2003. – 256 s.
54. Koshland DE Jr, Nemethy G, Filmer D. Comparison of experimental binding data and theoretical models in proteins containing subunits// Biochemistry. – 1966. – №5. – R. 365–385.
55. Goldbeter A., Koshland DE Jr. An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems// Proc Natl Acad Sci. – 1981. – № 78. – R. 6840–6844.
56. Rubin A. B., Pytyeva N. F., Riznichenko G. Yu. Kinetika biologicheskikh protsessov: Ucheb. posobiye. – 2-e izd. – M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1977. – 328 s.
57. Berezin I. V., Klesov A.A. Praktichesky kurs khimicheskoy i fermentativnoy kinetiki. – M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1976. – 320 s.
58. Kolinko P.A., Kozlov D. V. Khimicheskaya kinetika v kurse fizicheskoy khimii. Novosibirsk: Nov Gos. Univ., 2013. – 99 s.
59. Berezin I.V., Martinek K. Osnovy fizicheskoy khimii fermentativnogo kataliza. – M. : Vysshaya shkola, 1977. – 280 s.
60. Romanovsky, Yu.M., Stepanova, N.V., Chernavsky, D.S. Matematicheskaya biofizika. – M.: Nauka, Glavnaya redaktsiya fiziko-matematicheskoy literatury, 1984. – 304 s.
61. Haldane J.B.S. Enzymes– London, Longmans Green, 1930. – PP. 28–53, 74–92.
62. Lineweaver, H., Burk, D. The determination of enzyme disso-ciation constants// J Am Chem Soc. – 1930. – № 56(3). – PP. 658–666.
63. Yano T., Nakahara T., Kamiyama S., Yamada K. Kinetic studies on microbial activities in concentrated solutions. I. Effect of excess sugars on oxygen uptake rate of a cell-free respiratory system//Agricultural and Biological Chemistry. – 1966. – №30. PP. 43-48.
64. Wang J.L., Wan W. The effect of substrate concentration on biohydrogen production by using kinetic models// Science in China Series B: Chemistry. – 2008. –№ 51 (11). – PP. 1110–1117.
65. Tazdaıt D., Abdi N., Grib H., Lounici H., Pauss A., Mameri N. Comparison of different models of substrate inhibition in aerobic batch biodegradation of malathion// Turk. J. Eng. Environ. Sci. – 2013. –№ 37. – PP. 221–230.
66. Karakhim S. A. Ob istinnykh i kazhushchikhsya konstantakh Mikhaelisa v enzimo logii. І. Otlichitelnye priznaki// Ukr. bіokhіm. zhurn. – 2011. – T. 83. - № 5. – S. 94–109.
67. Reed M.C., Lieb A, Nijhout H.F. The biological significance of substrate inhibition: a mechanism with diverse functions// Bioessays. – 2010. - PP. 422–429.
68. Fromm H.J. Summary of kinetic reaction mechanisms// Methods in Enzymology. – 1979. – V. 63. – PP. 42 – 53.
69. Tuşat E., Mikailsoy F. An investigation of the criteria used to select the polynomial modelsemployed in local GNSS/ leveling geoid determination studies// Arabian J. Geosciences. – 2019. –№ 8(24). – PP. 801.
Review
For citations:
Mikailsoy F.D. INFLUENCE OF HIGH SUBSTRATE CONCENTRATIONS ON CATALASE REACTION IN LOAM SOIL (YGDIR PROVINCE, TURKEY). I. THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF THE KINETICS OF ENZYMATIC SOIL REACTIONS. Soil Science and Agrichemistry. 2022;(3):60-86. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.51886/1999-740X_2022_3_60
Views:
89
Email this article 