Preview

Soil Science and Agrichemistry

Advanced search

SPRING WHEAT PRODUCTIVITY DEPENDING ON THE FARMING SYSTEM IN THE CONDITIONS OF AKMOLA REGION

Abstract

The article presents data on the moisture content, , and labile phosphorous in the soil in traditional and organic farming. The authors consider the dependence of spring soft wheat yield on the preceding crop (melilot and wheatgrass), soil fertility elements, and fertilizers. The amount of productive moisture in a meter soil layer did not depend on the farming system but varied depending on the preceding crop. The highest soil moisture accumulation was 137 mm on the melilot variant in two years of research. The farming system, unlike the preceding crop, did not affect accumulation in the soil before sowing wheat. The N-NO3 content on melilot variant was 10.8 mg/kg in the 0-40 cm soil layer in 2018, and 35.6 mg/kg in 2019. This indicator was 2 times lower on the wheatgrass variant for similar periods. The content of mobile phosphorus before sowing in a 0-20 cm soil layer for 2018-2019 varied from 18.6 to 35.0 mg / kg of soil, regardless of the farming system and predecessor, which is a consequence of the heterogeneity of the soil cover. Spring wheat productivity was on average 5.2 and 5.3 c/ha higher in traditional farming than in organic farming over research period. Melilot was a better preceding crop, irrespective of the farming system, where the yield was 23-30% higher compared to the wheatgrass. Key words: spring soft wheat, traditional farming, organic farming, melilot, wheatgrass, phosphorus.

About the Authors

P. E. Nazarova
LLP «A I Barayev Research and Production Centre for Grain Farming»
Kazakhstan


E. V. Mamykin
LLP «A I Barayev Research and Production Centre for Grain Farming»
Kazakhstan


V. M. Filonov
LLP «A I Barayev Research and Production Centre for Grain Farming»
Kazakhstan


O. V. Tkachenko
LLP «A I Barayev Research and Production Centre for Grain Farming»
Kazakhstan


References

1. Oikarinen M. Biological soil amelioration as the basis of sustainable agriculture and forestry // Biology and fertility of soils. - 1996. - № 22. - Р. 342-344.

2. Акимбекова Ч. У Возможности производства органическои продукции сельского хозяиства в Казахстане. Земледелие и селекция сельскохозяиственных растении на современном этапе // Сб. докладов международнои научнопрактическои конференции, посвященнои 60-летию зернового хозяиства им. А. И. Бараева (Всесоюзныи, затем Казахскии зернового хозяиства им. А. И. Бараева). - Шортанды, 2016. - С. 411-414.

3. Lynch D. Environmental impacts of organic agriculture: A Canadian perspective // Canadian Journal of Plant Science. - 2009. - № 89(4). - P. 621-628.

4. Mason H. E., Spaner D. Competitive ability of wheat in conventional and organic management systems: A review of the literature // Canadian Journal of Plant Science. -2006. - № 86 (2). - P.333-343.

5. Badgley C.,.Moghtader J.,.Quintero E., _Zakem E., _Jahi Chappell M.,.Aviles-Vazquez K., Samulon A.,.Perfecto I. Organic agriculture and the global food supply // Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems. - 2007. - Vol. 22, Issue 2. - Р. 86-108

6. Шульце Э., Пахомова Н. В., Нестеренко Н. Ю., Крылова Ю. В., Рихтер К. К. Традиционное и органическое сельское хозяиство: анализ сравнительнои эффективности с позиции концепции устоичивого развития // Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. - 2015. - №5 (4). - С. 4-39.

7. Кудряков В. Г., Мирончук В. А., Есаян С. А. Государственное регулирование органического земледелия: основы и особенности Европеиского и Американского законодательства // Научныи журнал КуГАУ - 2015. - № 105 (01). - С. 505-522.

8. Willer H., Lernoud J. The world of Organic Agriculture Statistics and Emerging Trends. - 2019. - 351 р.

9. Willer H., Yussefi-Menzler M., Sorensen N. The world of Organic Agriculture Statistics and Emerging Trends. - 2008. - 238 р.

10. Reganold J. P.,.Wachter J. M. Organic agriculture in the twentyfirst century // Nature Plants. - 2016. - № 2 (2). - P. 1-8.

11. Сдобникова О. В. Условия почвенного питания и применение удобрении в Северном Казахстане и Западнои Сибири // Автореф. дис. дра с.-х. наук. - М., 1971. - 43 с.

12. ГОСТ 26205-91. Почвы. Определение подвижных соединении фосфора и калия по методу Мачигина в модификации

13. Доспехов Б. А. Методика полевого опыта: (С основами статистическои обработки результатов исследовании) // Б. А. Доспехов. - М.: Агропромиздат, 1985. -351 с.

14. Kirchmann H., Bergstrom L., Katterer T, Mattsson L. and Gesslein S. Comparison of longterm organic and conventional croplivestock systems on a previously nutrientdepleted soil in Sweden // Agronomy Journal. - 2007. - Vol. 99, No. 4. - Р. 960-972.


Review

For citations:


Nazarova P.E., Mamykin E.V., Filonov V.M., Tkachenko O.V. SPRING WHEAT PRODUCTIVITY DEPENDING ON THE FARMING SYSTEM IN THE CONDITIONS OF AKMOLA REGION. Soil Science and Agrichemistry. 2020;(3):64-72. (In Russ.)

Views: 92


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1999-740X (Print)
ISSN 2959-3433 (Online)